Was called away. So while I try to catch up, I would like to pose this question. Here is Jimmy's analysis of Mok's game here.
Now in this scenario, can we say that Mok probably know the technicalities involved in resolving this end game problem? Say if he was given it as a puzzle while he is having coffee at home?
I want to now invite the readers to participate. In any one tournament, how many lost games would you attribute to a lack of technical knowledge? What I mean is that you do not have the knowledge to solve the problem. And how many games would you attribute to a "slip of the mind"? Be honest now. No one can see your thoughts apart from yourself.