Friday, July 12, 2013
Is this also what is happening in MCF?
The "chess clubs" elect the State Officials. And presumably the chess clubs represent the players as was intended by COS. But then the chess clubs are ignored. The State AGM is only on paper and the chess clubs not called up to vote as I am informed happens in at least one "State Affliliate".
So in at least one State Affiliate there is no voice at all from the players. And somehow that State Affiliate is able to vote at the MCF AGM.
And when they get into MCF, they try to bend MCF into following their private agenda.
Don't you think something is wrong? Don't you think only genuine State Affiliates should be able to vote? Otherwise where is the mandate to govern coming from?