First GM spent a day in Singapore visiting the Asean chess Academy and the Singapore Chess Federation. Our purpose was purely exploratory and a learning visit. On the day we were first thorougly briefed on their structure and their modules. We were also invited to see their trainers in action. We were brought to see the courses they conduct in schools and in their academy. We also saw how they trained their junior squad and could freely walk in, talk to the students and trainers.
Out of curiousity, I asked them how they prepared for Asean so we have a measure of what our competency gap was. We were told that their National Coach attached to the Federation begins by preparing the data base of their competitors and download their games and then passes this information to the respective trainers of their National Squad. One trainer for 4 to 6 players. The trainers then go through the preparation with their respective players and later accompany the players to the tournament, where they give continuous guidance.
Impressive. It does look like we have a way to go to give our own kids that kind of support.
Their weekly training program for their National squad also encourages continuous progress out of International competition.
At the end of the day First GM did an evaluation of the visit. Our opinion is that their system may not be perfect. I didnt see a strong approach to mental coaching. First GM believes that ultimately strong chess players are about character. That mental fortitude to take the next step in the face of gruelling challenges as we climb up the mountain and the mind is crying out to give up.
However they have a structure to support this when that need is recognised.
Another positive note was their willingness to share information so that we can make informed choices and decisions. We were shown their modules, fee structure, the forms parents are required to fill in etc.
I had an interesting exchange with Ignatius on the visit. He asked if it will be bad for First GM to visit Singapore. I told him the answer is No. I referred him to our Vision and philosophy. Read here.
First GM is about getting results. Just like Singapore who seek trainers from overseas, we too will look for knowledge to help our kids. And we seek genuine partners in our endeavour. Smart partnerships.
On the visit to the Federation we were informed that they have their own building and they raised their own funds to build it. This gave us a glimpse on what results we can expect should we decide to enter into a partnership with them. What results we can expect in 5 years, 10 years etc. We think it is something worth considering. Their ability to share knowledge is in our mind a strong plus point in their favour.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
By comparision our officials more interested in getting themselves re-elected and go on trips
ReplyDeleteIt did seem to us that they are much more result oriented certainly. And they have put in alot more thought and effort than we have. If we can use them as a benchmark then maybe someday we will have the talent to export to the world.
ReplyDeleteYou are right, Jimmy. That's why our officials work for. Whoever they are, they should 'win' with respect. All of us, officials or the senior players too, should 'get-benefit' with the proper channel. Come on Seniors! Show the right moves to the Juniors! Do not go 'wild-carded'! Malu lah...
ReplyDeleteSomething to ponder about?
ReplyDeletehttp://chessfood4thought.blogspot.com/2010/08/scf-about-kasparovs-visit.html
Forget the politics. Why not get more experience by playing outside Malaysia and Asean region. Maybe bring Malaysian juniors to compete in Australia?
ReplyDelete